Derrell Poole - Don't let the caption on the title photo throw you - I'm
still talking about original build cars.
One lot of 20 stock cars was built in November and December
of 1907. They were numbered 7065 to 7084. Like other Type II cars they used
Bettendorf cast trucks and body bolsters. The cost of these cars was 700.00
each.
According to certain records another lot of 3 Stock cars was
also built in November. These were specifically to replace 3 of 5 AC&F Type
cars (numbered 7015 to 7064) that had been destroyed as of April that year. The
cost of the replacements was only 650.00 each. Since they still owed money to
the Trust under which the C&S had purchased these 1900 vintage cars they
were obliged to maintain the lot. The
AC&F numbers to be replaced were 7016, 7046 and 7058; the new cars carried
the old numbers but they were indeed Type II cars.
But other records suggest that we
don't know the full story. In fact, this does not seem to be the first time the
Railroad replaced a missing AC&F car. Numbers 7054 and 7015 had been
destroyed in 1904 and 05 respectively. Their values of 634.37 each had been
recorded on January 1, 1906 in an
Equipment Renewal Analysis. Both cars seem to have been replaced prior to the
fall of 1907 but there is no actual record of this. The Official Railway
Equipment Register reflected the losses between 1904 and 05 but then regained
the count only to exclude the replacements to be built in late 1907. As of
September the net balance of the 7015 series stood at 47 cars.
What seems in-congruent is that
7015 along with the 3 replacements cars built as Type IIs were grouped with the
7065 series in a document titled "Unit Record of Property Changes -
Equipment". This strongly suggests that 7015 was, in fact, a Type II car.
The URPC-E appears to date from the late teens when the ICC was developing its
Valuation Reports. Was 7015 perhaps the very first Type II car built? The
records suggest a practice to first built a single car of any new design before
the shops got down to the business of out shopping an entire series; sort of a
sample car, perhaps to address any shortcomings. But this doesn't seem
plausible once we realize the particular circumstances of 1906 and 07. The Type
I Boxcars were about to be built in early 1906 when a massive fire destroyed a
substantial part of the facilities in February. In fact, the building of the
Type I Boxcars was delayed until just shortly before the first run Type II cars
were built. This is not to say that one Stock car of the Type II design could
not have been built before the Type I Boxcars but even the ORER does not
support this.
It could very well be that 7054
had already been built prior to the fire. It could have been built to a unique
Type I frame but more likely it was simply a reconstruction of the AC&F
design (the two designs were nearly identical anyway). Interestingly 7054 was
not listed anywhere in the URPC-E.
Thus it seems, despite 1907 records, there were actually 4
Type II cars that replaced AC&F numbers. Incidentally there isn't any clue
as to why the replacement cars were 50.00 cheaper than the new cars.
Under AFE 603 fifty Type III SUF Stock cars were built in
1910. They were numbered 7085 to 7134. All 50 cars were apparently turned out
in August at a cost of 700.00 each.
In Figure 17 we see the roof variations of a Type II and a
pair of Type III models. The Type II cars were equipped with wood roofs but the
Type III cars used the outside Murphy roofs
like the Type II and III Boxcars. Since 7065 is nearly 3 years older
than the SUF cars I've tried to weather its roof to support that vintage. The
running boards on the SUF cars also vary from each other and sets up a bit of
variety in a train. Wood roof walks were typically not painted.
The Type II car in Figure 17 represents a car that has been
in use for nearly 3 years. Its paint is faded and the car displays plenty of
road grime but it is still in good shape. On the other hand 7085 is spanking
new - again to validate the vintage of late 1910.
The model of 7065 was built several years ago from a Berlyn
Kit. As it stands, the stock Berlyn kit is grossly over-sized. To build the
model correctly I bashed it with PBL Type III parts. As I recall I milled off
the end sills and sheathing and replaced them on the PBL end pieces. I simply
glued an additional strip of plastic along the bottom edges of the new sides
pieces. These modifications were necessary since the sills of the 1910 cars were
7" deep as opposed to the 1907 cars that had 9" sills.
Since building 7065 I've acquired additional Type II box car
ends from Paul Vaughn who now owns the Berlyn C&S kits. I have 4 more kits
to build and the Boxcar ends should reduce some of the work that the PBL parts
require. But you will still need the side pieces.
Cars 7085 and 7089 were built from PBL kits. I had obtained
these for parts to correct the Type II kits. But I when I ordered additional
parts from PBL I decided to go ahead and built the Type III cars. These are the
only SUF Stock cars I intend to run on my layout.
You should also purchase the PBL spurs with the door parts
because the Berlyn doors are unusable. You will notice that the doors on both
Types are different from those of later periods. As much as I've looked, doors
seem to have changes along with everything else in the late teens. I milled a
jig out of aluminum to lay out the door slats for this configuration and then
glued them into the commercial door frames.
In figure 21 you will notice that the various details of
lettering are located on the side sills of 7065 while they are located on the
lowest slat of the siding in figure 22. It isn't too hard to understand this
reasoning on cars with 7" side sills. The side brace castings are brass
etchings simply glued into place since these are different from the braces on
the Type III Stock cars (compare Figures 17 and 17).
Compare the Type II side sills in Figure 21 to the location
of the same lettering on the SUF cars. Once again dates in both cases validate
the vintage I am modeling.
All Type II stock cars were built in 1907 and therefore have
only the 1907 cast Striker. But if you look closely you will see that there are
a couple of errors on 7065. I failed to include the draft gear data on this end
of the car because at the time I was not sure that this appeared on both ends.
The same mistake occurred on the SUF cars where only one end has the markings.
This was also due to a shortage of the correct decals necessary to do both
ends. Another error was the lack of the Retainer Valve descriptor that should
be located below the diagram and left of the brake staff on the SUF cars. If
you look closely at the end of 7065 in figure 16 you will see this descriptor
in the right location. Another error is that the airline goes thru the end
sill. This is a feature of the AC&F cars but not the later builds.
One of the big questions about Stock cars is that of double
decks. So far there is never mention in the records of multiple decks during
original construction of any C&Sng stock car. I believe additional decks
were installed much later. In the URPC-E removable double decks were installed
in some of the Type III cars during April and May of 1928. My research has
turned up records of the late '30s that indicate some AC&F and Type II cars
had also been equipped with double decks. A clue I have not looked into would
be the Stock pens and loading chutes and when they started to appear.
Derrell Poole
Hamilton MT.