Keith Hayes - A challenge modeling in 1:64 is the lack of large period
masonry buildings. One either has to kit-bash, scratch build or look to other
scales. I am modeling a spur to the Arkansas Valley Smelter and needed a more
substantial masonry building for the spur. A visit to the local hobby shop
resulted in purchase of a Walthers 1:87 Dayton Machine Company kit. The brick
detail is nice and the size was right, but the windows were a dead giveaway. I
would clearly need to adjust these to make the kit look right on my 1:64
layout.
An emerging technology you have probably heard of is 3D
printing or Rapid Prototyping. There are now several vendors that allow you to
post your models to their servers and they will print the part for you and mail
it to you. The vendor I used is Shapeways (www.shapeways.com). A number of
modelers have created models and parts and a variety of scales, so be sure to
check out the website thoroughly, as what you want may already be available.
3D printing uses different resins in a string, kind of like
a dot matrix printer, except the printing head moves in all three dimensions
and thus can lay down resin not only in the X-Y plane of the 'paper,' but also
in space along the Z axis. Because the printer builds one layer at a time, it
is possible to build very complex forms that would otherwise be very difficult
to model.
Shapeways will support a number of different software
products. I chose to model my parts in SketchUp, which is free, and export the
files as a .DAE format. This is all explained on the Shapeways website.
Shapeways offers a number of resins, and it is important to read the
limitations of each, as each has different resolution requirements. This was
among my chief issues. Also, the build area on current machines is less than a
cubic foot, more like 8" or 10" on a side, though building something
this large would be very expensive.
For starters, the resolution issues are in metric: for the
resins I selected, I was generally limited to sections no smaller than 1 mm and
relief of at least 0.5 mm. These are large in 1:64, over an inch at scale. As
this was an experiment, I ordered parts in a couple different materials,
flexible plastic, frosted plastic, and frosted detail plastic. Each of these
comes in at different price points.
I chose to build my windows to scale. Were I to do it again,
I would probably build them full size, scale them down and check the resolution
issues. When you submit a model to Shapeways, it first goes through an
automated check and then before production a real person checks the file for
issues. If your file has challenges, you will receive an e-mail illustrating
the issues that need correction.
I started with the windows as I needed the most of these. I
am modeling an industrial building and chose to use a steel sash window with an
operable part in the middle. The neat thing about this technology is that you
can customize to your hearts content and only order what you need. I tried the
flexible plastic, which is the lowest price point and reasonably affordable (~$1
per part). This material is grainy and has the potential to warp. It also seems
difficult to sand. I modeled these vertically (as if they are in a wall plane)
and they have a noticeable front and back side. They take paint fine.
For the next project, I modeled some doors. At a friends
suggestion, I modeled these flat (in the ground plane) to address the grain
issue. If anything it may have made it worse. The doors are all in plastic or
detail plastic, which triples the cost. This material smells a bit like coconut
and seems to sand better. It takes paint okay, but paint can settle in corners
easily.
I now have all the parts I need for my kit-bash. Shapeways
has changed their website quite a bit in the six months I have been using it.
It takes 2-3 weeks to get parts once you post them, though you can pay more for
speedy mail service. The ability to customize is a real plus; the challenge is
the coarseness of the resolution in small scales and the grain of the material.
This can also be expensive: with shipping I have about $100 into my window and
door experiment.
I was excited to use 3D printing to model a cattle guard
built of surplus rail, but the resolution limitations rejected the model. I am
going to give the technology one more chance with a model of the Leadville
water standpipe. Otherwise, I think I may turn to laser cut wood for the
Leadville depot and roundhouse windows and doors.
Keith Hayes
The original Walthers kit. |
Unpainted window that has been sanded. |
Starting to look real. Ignore the painters tape. |
Keith Hayes
Modeling Leadville in Sn3
Very interesting, good food for thought.... What about 3D scanning or is that too far in the future?
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to seeing the finished product!
ReplyDeleteKeith has added three more pictures to this post. I too am looking forward to his final result.
ReplyDeleteTrev, 3D scanning is here--we have investigated it for some building projects. It is rather expensive, but for certain applications is just the ticket. For example, NPS has been doing some scans at Mesa Verde, and it is remarkable (to me) how different the scans are from previously (presumably carefully executed) measured drawings. I think the application we are all waiting for is a way to execute figures in particular poses affordably.
ReplyDeleteIn other news, I see that Dremel announced a 3D printer last week. The post I saw did not give high marks for the resolution and the reviewer indicated a continued preference for Shapeways. If folks have tips on how to improve the resolution, I am all ears. I continue to work on my Leadville Water Column.
Keith Hayes
Leadville in Sn3
Nice work Keith. Been using Shapeways for several years now for both Sn3 and On3 (San Juan Decals D&RGW 6200 flat car kit parts), though I did design some clerestory coach roofs for Heartland Railway in HOn3 which came out nice, even using one of the cheaper materials. There are other rapid prototypers out there which I'd like to try, but the Shapeways business model suits my needs for now.
ReplyDeleteI would rather stick to the larger scales for the resolution issues you mention, I've even done some 1:20.3 which can get pricey. I use the Frosted Ultra Detail (FUD) for the majority of my pieces, again for the finer detail.
Keep us posted on your efforts.
Mike McKenzie
Frankfort IL
Mike:
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments. It is reassuring to know that others struggle with the texture and resolution issues I have experienced. Darel has a link to an N Scale Blog, 'Prince Street Terminal,' and that modeler appears to be using Shapeways to model many items for his N Scale pike. While the posted renders look excellent, they are just that--renderings, not the actual casting or 3D print. Jack Burgess also wrote a fine discussion on this topic in the recent issue of the Gazette--quite by coincidence I should add. Jack is a very discerning modeler, and I was surprised he did not note the texture issue, though you can see some grain in at least one of the photos.
If you have an example of your 3D printing, please contact Darel, and I am certain he would be happy to share it. In the mean time, I continue to work on the Smelter.
Keith Hayes
Leadville in Sn3